Sunday, January 2, 2011

Electroshock Beneficial?

Over winter break, I read Wishful Drinking a memoir by Carrie Fisher.  For those of you who do not know of George Lucas’ six year saga, Star Wars, or otherwise live under a rock, Fisher portrayed the female lead, Princess Leia.  She also gains some fame as Debbie Reynolds’ daughter, of Singin’ in the Rain fame.  From Fisher’s novel’s name, you can guess that she delves into her alcoholism, but also her bipolar disorder and other life difficulties.  She writes her life from the perspective of an amused onlooker, because of some memory loss due to recent shock therapy.  And thus, my blog post begins.  It astonished me to think of electroshock or electroconvulsive therapy, its modern title, as an acceptable form of contemporary treatment.  She even mentioned those with whom she shares “electrocompany” including Judy Garland, Ernest Hemingway, and Cole Porter.  From Ken Kesey’s portrayal of electro shock in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, I would not imagine people of such great genius and high esteem to have experienced something so awfully life-changing as EST.  Kesey associates the treatment with “screaming… ‘Brain Burning’… [and] slaughterhouse” which creates a foreboding and unpleasant tone (Kesey 188-190).  Fisher even mentioned how Kesey’s view of EST dissuaded her: “[Her] only exposure of it was Jack Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest… traumatic, dangerous, and humiliating” (Fisher 13).  But Fisher’s real-life experience with electroconvulsive therapy ended positively, in contrast with much of Kesey’s novel.  And even having lost many of her life’s memories, Fisher seems to have a comical if not positive view of the event.  She says her memories “are lost—along with the crippling feeling of defeat and hopelessness.  Not a tremendous price to pay when you look at it” (Fisher 11).  Sarcastic undertones or not, Fisher poses an interesting exchange.  Would you rather keep your memories along with your debilitating depression or lose your memories and gain happiness?

4 comments:

  1. Whoa, that is a tough question Mary Beth, and I'm totally going to sidestep it by telling you what a phenomenal post I think this is. First of all, you read a book of over break. That's so entirely foreign of a concept to me that it blows me away, and encourages me to compliment you on your desire to do something productive with your time. Secondly, this post is a little bit humorous. Your line about awareness of the Star Wars saga made me chuckle, then realize that I remember Jillian mention that she has sadly never seen the movies, then chuckle some more. But anyways, about that question, I'd say I would go for happiness and no memories. In my opinion, the time we spend when we make new memories is so fantastic, that it outweighs just remembering them. After all, when memorable things happen, we don't even realize it at first, we just enjoy them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Memories make our personality. ECT destroys brain cells and neurones indiscriminately. The happy concussed feeling last 4 weeks so you have to keep having top-ups - more brain damage. Don't do it.
    ECT is big business. One day they will pay for it - like the tobacco industry.
    Click on the ECT tab at http://www.breggin.com/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cheryl I completely agree with you, why work hard to achieve things in everyday life if you have no memory of them in a couple weeks? It takes away our personality (like Cheryl pointed out so wisely below), drive to accomplish goals, and almost the point of living as a whole. So to answer your question Mary Beth, I would rather keep my memory and work to get out of a depressed state with other methods.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mary Beth, this is a fascinating post and you bring up a very difficult question. Personally, I would rather lose my memories and gain happiness. I like to think of myself as more of a future-oriented person than one that dwells only on the past. Cheryl, your comment also intrigued me, but I disagree with you on some points. First of all, success stories of ECT abound without the negative effects (memory loss, temporary benefits, etc.) that you have mentioned - take, for example, the story of Sherwin Nuland. You can watch a talk he delivers on http://www.ted.com/talks/sherwin_nuland_on_electroshock_therapy.html. Dr. Breggin has obviously found some cases with negative outcomes, but any treatment has both positive and negative outcomes - chemotherapy, for example, contributes just over 2 percent to improved survival in cancer patients (http://www.icnr.com/articles/ischemotherapyeffective.html). Yet chemotherapy is widely used, because it is the best option for treating cancer patients at the moment, just as ECT may be the best treatment for patients with depression. Although ECT does destroy brain cells, these can be regrown. Even if they could not be regrown, I would gladly trade a few brain cells for a life free of depression.

    ReplyDelete